Thesis statement for capital punishment essay
Why choose our homework help? Because we know exactly what matters most to you. Leave all papers to us and rest! Free Revisions.
Do My Homework for Me | Pay for Expert on misisichtpor.tk
If you feel that your paper could use more work, send it for a free revision. On-time Delivery. Deadlines are sacred for our writers, with them you will never miss the submission date. Give us a try even if your paper is due tomorrow! Copypasting is out of the question, our writers perform professional research and deliver original content. Your academic reputation is safe with us! High-quality papers. So let us improve your grades by taking care of your homework! Custom homework help. Your custom homework help is one click away! Order now.
Check out how Homeworkfor.
Check out how Homeworkfor.me works
Place an order. Start with the subject, topic and volume, specify the deadline and your academic level. Go to order form.
Check your total price. Add extra features if your homework needs a special touch. Submit payment details. Hence drawing a conclusion that death penalty is not a good form of deterrence and cannot deter people from committing crimes.
- friendship of mice and men essay;
- essay on quaid e azam in english for class 6.
- Introduction to Death penalty.
- thesis theoretical physics?
- shakespeare othello essay questions?
- compare and contrast the characters of romeo and juliet essay!
Many types of research have shown that the capital punishment as well life imprisonment have the same deterrence effect. A scholar by the name Professor Isaac Ehrlich who is a writer and an economist developed a theory of deterrence. The theory posited that capital punishment was a form of deterrence. He used complex mathematical equations to prove that some people were saved by the virtue of the fact that death penalty was in place Ehrlich, He mentioned that in every execution between the years and had successfully deterred criminals from committing approximately eight homicides.
His study was hailed by many as a breakthrough in as far as the study of deterrence was considered, and he, therefore, gained a nationwide popularity. However, there were many critiques of his work by conceptual and methodological misunderstandings. More so, the research failed to gain respect because deterrence in some instances is difficult to formulate equations. It is also difficult to calculate a ratio of those people saved by the deterrence because most of the research tend to suggestive instead of being definitive.
A part from the contradicting views by the scholars on the field, there are no statistics that show that the rate of homicide is lower in those states that have the death penalty. His idea can be considered as being noble but fails to have concrete proof to back it up.
He also failed to publish any work that can be considered credible on the field of deterrence on the death penalty. The scenario involving attorney Diane Marshall can be used as a case study to prove the ineffectiveness of death penalty. One convicted murder told him that even if people are told that they are going to be boiled in oil, they would not be deterred because criminals have it in mind that they will not be caught in crime. Criminals most of the times fail to stop and think about the possible consequences of the actions they are about to undertake.
It had been suggested that public execution was a good way of making criminals think of the repercussion of their actions.
It was common in cities and towns in the United States and served as a long-lasting emotional and visual dramatization that made people think more of the consequences of crime. However, in the s, this method ceased being operational.
A Strong Thesis Statement: Tips and Examples
This was because was barbaric and intentionally undercut the deterrence function. The society has been considered as having a long history of using punishment as a means of scaring people from committing crimes. The fact that the opinions of many are that the society has the highest interest in curbing murder and, therefore, should use the highest form of deterrence. This deterrent is the death penalty. This has been championed by the popular view that in instances where murderers are killed, potential future murderers will be deterred by the instilled fear of losing the life.
However, it should be noted that contrary to the pro-deterrent ideas some studies have revealed that death penalty does not have a deterrent effect. To further prove that death penalty is ineffective, we can consider states to elucidate the assertions.
- speech on moral values and culture.
- teaching assistant cover letter!
- Death Penalty Essay Writing Guide - misisichtpor.tk?
- valuable lessons learned essay?
- Buy Cheap Essay | misisichtpor.tk.
- writing essays for university guide!
- Cite This Resource:.
Out of 12 states, ten states without capital punishment have the rates of homicide being below the national average. This is to say that death penalty had a higher rate of homicide compared to the states with the death penalty. Conclusively, with or without the death penalty, people are still going to commit crimes. This act is condoned by people who state the inadmissibility of taking away the life of a living being.
Therefore, the role of the death penalty as a way of reducing violence in any society seems to be unconvincing. Though it may be denied, racial and ethnic prejudices still function in modern societies. People are often guided with stereotypes when making decisions or assessing the behaviors of others, and jury members sometimes do not make any exceptions. Also, it is stated that between the years and , 48 percent of the defendants in court cases where a death penalty was sought were African-Americans NAACP.
Xenophobic manifestations when holding a judicial decision are unfair by default, but they take on a special meaning when it comes to imposing a death sentence. In other words, if this kind of punishment is used mainly for a group of people who are different by racial and ethnic origins, it cannot be called a fair and efficient measure of punishment.
One of the most important functions of the judicial system is to punish criminals and to protect the innocent. However, mistakes happen and innocent people are sometimes wrongly accused, or the punishment they receive does not match the extent of their crimes. Here, another manifestation of the ineffectiveness of the death penalty can easily be seen. When actuated, it cannot be canceled or changed.
The Death Penalty, Argumentative Essay Sample
When a person is executed, it does not matter whether the case is reviewed later and the executed is then found innocent. This fact significantly reduces the efficiency of the death penalty, because it appears to be a rigid and disproportionate measure. In addition, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty is a judicial practice that helps reduce the number of crimes committed, compared to life imprisonment as a punishment. Sometimes, a life-term incarceration penalty may be even more of a deterrent for criminals than an execution, especially if state prison conditions are known to be harsh.
Based on the aforementioned arguments, it is concluded that the death penalty is an unfair and rather ineffective means of punishment. The death penalty is no less cumbersome for taxpayers than life imprisonment terms and the death penalty is connected to a number of costly procedures and additional trials.
In addition, the death sentence is immoral. It goes against the proclaimed values of human life. It is also stated that the death sentence is a measure of punishment more often imposed on people who are different in racial and ethnic origins.